A Best Practice Guidance has been developed to give best practice advice on data quality areas including: access, security and confidentiality; role based access control; pseudonymisation; SUS modules and data quality.
“The NHS Programme is big, expensive, not delivering and very New Labour,” said one source close to the Cabinet Office. “What happens to it will set the tone for the whole of public sector ICT.”
The sun is setting on the NpfIT and CfH. During the election, both the Tories and Lib Dems attacked the NPfIT. However, rather than terminating the programme in its entirety, the cost and complexity of terminating the LSP contracts, the government will aim to renegotiate the scope of these contracts. For example, public technology.net reports that apparently CSC has been asked to cut 30% from the value of its LSP contract. What does this mean for CfH? It appears that CfH will be axed and the Cabinet Office will take over responsibility for NHS IT whilst the Department of Health's Informatics Directorate may take up some of the responsibility. A formal announcement is imminent...
New guidance has recently been published to support the SUS handling of sensitive records and data protection relating to CDS XML and validation and patient identifiable data relating to CDS Version 6 SUS.
This guidance replaces the previous guidance issued by SUS on 20 October 2009. Check
Surpisingly, for something that is meant to improve healthcare, health informatics are far without controversy. In the UK alone, there have been countless of patient data loss incidents over the last years. Controversial dabatases and services (aka SCR, SUS...). And as far as implementation of top IT systems are concerned, we all know the now familiar story of what is the NPfIT. Still, that should not detract from the fact health informatics help improve health outcomes every day.
The Health-tekIT blog will bring to you the latest in UK health informatics focusing especially on the controversies (or otherwise) that are making the headlines.